Skip to main content
CS

Implementing Renewal Forecasting to identify and safeguard renewals early

  • April 21, 2026
  • 6 replies
  • 58 views

Jef Vanlaer
Forum|alt.badge.img+3

Renewal risk that surfaces at 90 days before renewal almost always exists at 6 months as well. The problem is that without a structured process, it stays invisible for too long. CSMs know something feels off, but there’s no consistent moment to surface it, no documented action, and no leadership visibility until it’s nearly too late.

We built a Renewal Forecasting process in Gainsight to fix exactly that. Happy to answer questions or compare notes: drop a comment or send me a message!

 

How it works

 

The process runs at two fixed checkpoints: 6 months before renewal and 3 months before renewal. At each one, an automated risk signal meets a CSM assessment. When they align, the status is confirmed. When they don’t, CS leadership reviews and sets the final call. The disagreement doesn’t get averaged away or ignored.

Every at-risk or uncertain renewal triggers a mandatory Action Plan CTA, where the CSM documents risk drivers, mitigation actions and next steps. Progress is tracked through linked Timeline notes.

At 3 months, Monitor is no longer a valid status. CSMs must commit to Good or At Risk.
 

 

Implementing Renewal Forecasting in Gainsight CS

 

Prerequisites

This process assumes you have a Gainsight Scorecard in place with measures that meaningfully reflect renewal risk. The automated risk assessment is only as good as the signals feeding into it. At TrendMiner, we use the overall Score, Adoption Score, and Risk Score as the three triggers, but the right measures will depend on your specific setup.

Our setups works on the Relationship level, but it’ll do just as well on the Company level (just read Company wherever I write Relationship).

 

Enrich your Relationship Object

In Data Management, add the following fields to the Relationship Object:

  • Renewal Risk 6 months (Automated / CSM / Final): Dropdown (Good, At Risk, Monitor)
  • Renewal Risk 3 months (Automated / CSM / Final): Dropdown (Good, At Risk)
  • Renewal Risk Comments: Text field for CSM and leadership notes
  • Renewal Action Plan CTA: Lookup to CTA Object (GSID of the linked Action Plan CTA)

 

Set up CTA Types

Create two CTA Types:

  • Renewal Risk Assessment 6 months
  • Renewal Risk Assessment 3 months

 

Build the Automated Risk Rules

Create two Rules (one per checkpoint) that:

  1. Calculate automated renewal risk from scorecard data. Our logic: if Overall Score OR Adoption Score OR Risk Score < 50 → At Risk; otherwise → Good
  2. Write the result to the corresponding Relationship field
  3. Create the assessment CTA for the CSM

 

Add the CSM Assessment Step (CTA)

The CSM receives the CTA and selects their assessment in the Relationship tab: Good, At Risk, or Monitor (6-month only). The assessment should reflect current reality: usage, value perception, stakeholder alignment, renewal signals. Not just what the scorecard says. The use the Comments field to explain their assessment.

 

Calculate the Final Renewal Risk

A Rule compares the automated and CSM assessments:

  • If they match, the Final status is confirmed
  • If they don’t, CS leadership reviews and sets the Final status through a Renewal Forecasting dashboard

 

Trigger Action Plan CTAs

A Rule automatically creates an Action Plan CTA for all At Risk and Monitor customers. For At Risk customers, the CSM documents key risk drivers, planned mitigation actions, and next customer-facing steps. For Monitor customers, the CTA outlines what additional information is needed and how it will be gathered. All updates are tracked via linked Timeline notes.

A Timeline Template is available for the Update Activity Type to guide CSMs on what to cover in each update.

 

Write the Action Plan CTA reference back to the Relationship

A Rule writes the Action Plan CTA’s GSID to the Renewal Action Plan CTA field on the Relationship, so the latest action plan is always one click away from any report or dashboard.

 

Build a Daily Snapshot Object

A Daily Snapshot Rule captures renewal risk status for each upcoming renewal once per day, ensuring each renewal appears only once and giving leadership a clean portfolio view.

 

Build the Renewal Forecasting Dashboard

Create a dashboard for CS leadership with two views: renewals within 3 months and renewals in the 3 to 6 month window. For each renewal, surface Automated Risk, CSM Risk, and Final Risk at both checkpoints, plus a direct link to the latest Action Plan CTA.

 

Add a cleanup Rule

After each renewal closes, a Rule clears all renewal risk fields on the Relationship, keeping the object clean for the next cycle.

 

What this gives you

 

No renewal reaches the last 90 days without a documented risk status. Every at-risk customer has a maintained action plan. Leadership spends their time on exceptions, not on chasing down missing data. When automated and CSM assessments diverge, there’s a clear owner and a clear decision. Not a gap.

We’re not yet at the point of attaching ARR impact to each renewal in the forecast. That’s the next step. But the foundation is solid: risk identified early, actions documented, visibility consistent.

6 replies

revathimenon
Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • Gainsight Community Manager
  • April 21, 2026

Appreciate you so much for sharing this ​@Jef Vanlaer ⭐


heather_hansen
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • April 21, 2026

@Jef Vanlaer I really like this.  Can you elaborate a bit more on how the CTA Assessment and Timeline portions work? Does the CSM just select the appropriate status in the CTA, and then, add comments? Are there reasons associated as well?  We’re working on an updated Early Warning System, and feels like this might be a good component to add.


KimStocks
  • Helper ⭐️
  • April 21, 2026

Can you provide more information on meaningful risk measurements for the scorecard?


Jef Vanlaer
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Author
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️
  • April 22, 2026

@Jef Vanlaer I really like this.  Can you elaborate a bit more on how the CTA Assessment and Timeline portions work? Does the CSM just select the appropriate status in the CTA, and then, add comments? Are there reasons associated as well?  We’re working on an updated Early Warning System, and feels like this might be a good component to add.

@heather_hansen We kept it really simple: just a picklist for the assessment, and a comments field to add some justification (see below). We don’t want to add too much administrative burden. FYI: we do have a risk management process through CTAs as well, that does use risk reasons.

The Timeline activities for the action plans are similarly simple: just updates without any additional fields. The Timeline template does provide a structure to make sure all necessary information is captured. An added example of having all these updates in the Timeline is the availability of this information for our AI Agents scraping the Timeline on a daily basis.

 

 


Jef Vanlaer
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Author
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️
  • April 22, 2026

Can you provide more information on meaningful risk measurements for the scorecard?

Hi ​@KimStocks 

While the overall health score typically provides a pointer towards the likelihood to renew of a customer, it’s my experience that individual measure groups (and maybe even individual measures) in itself provide important information as well. Our Scorecards consists of 4-5 measure groups of which Adoption and Risk typically correlate most with renewal/churn, which is why we also check these scores in the automated assessment:

  • The Adoption group contains measures that provide a full picture of platform adoption: license utilization, usage frequency, evolution of active user numbers, module usage. The overall Score is a significant pointer telling us if the customer is adopting our platform to a decent extent (both depth and breadth) to get enough value.
  • The Risk group is based on our Risk Management process, where CSMs (or automation) create Risk CTAs in the Cockpit throughout their engagement with the customer to surface them within the team and create individual action plans. The severity of these CTAs (partial churn/full churn, are they escalated to management...) influences the Risk Score in the Scorecard. Hence, this is a good metric to capture potential renewal risk that is typically not present in other data sources.

Next to these groups, the Scorecards contain data on engagement, captured value (which is just a proxy for real value experienced), critical CSM actions… They obviously have an impact on the churn risk, but we don’t see direct correlation necessarily, so these are included in the assessment through the overall Risk Score.


romihache
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • April 23, 2026

This is very good and coming at a great time! Thanks ​@Jef Vanlaer  for taking the time to put this together, is very valuable info!