Skip to main content
New Idea

JO Reporting Enhancement - Be able to add multiple reporting categories to Journey Orchestrator program

Related products:None

andreammelde

We find it very difficult to report on our JO program currently. The folder ID does not provide the folder name, so it is basically not useful.

JO should be able to have multiple reporting categories associated bc they are often trying to achieve multiple goals in one program. For example, we have “Feedback” for our “Services” org that we would want to keep separate from our “feedback” from our Voice of Customer.

 

Another example is our KPI mapping. We would want to map “product type” and “kpi”.

 

The multiple reporting categories (or even a hierarchy of reporting category and a sub-category) would help us better understand how our JO are meeting the goals of the company.

 

We could then show our team that we have “x” number of programs in flight that address “y” goal of the company and the metrics associated

 

 

Reference to the below idea, but more robust

 

5 replies

heather_hansen
Forum|alt.badge.img+13
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 954 replies
  • March 15, 2022

+1 I love this idea!


bradley
Forum|alt.badge.img+7
  • Expert ⭐️
  • 1128 replies
  • March 15, 2022

@anirbandutta and @ophirsw  I think the Folder ID comment also falls under the general underlying interest of providing labels and not just IDs for things when reporting/troubleshooting etc. Folder ID can be helpful if you need it but the names/labels are what make things human-readable and human-actionable.


andreammelde
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Author
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️
  • 367 replies
  • May 4, 2022

Other reporting:

Add custom fields to JO like you can for Call to Action

  • for example, we need to indicate for some of our on-going programs how often they should be reviewed so that we can ensure there were no changes upstream that stopped the query from pulling participants
  • Versioning - we often will clone and tweak a program. It would be helpful to have a field for version rather than relying on naming convention

andreammelde
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Author
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️
  • 367 replies
  • March 4, 2024

Would like to see this functionality with the JO Horizon redesign


dayn.johnson
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 643 replies
  • March 4, 2024
bradley wrote:

@anirbandutta and @ophirsw  I think the Folder ID comment also falls under the general underlying interest of providing labels and not just IDs for things when reporting/troubleshooting etc. Folder ID can be helpful if you need it but the names/labels are what make things human-readable and human-actionable.

andreammelde wrote:

Other reporting:

Add custom fields to JO like you can for Call to Action

  • for example, we need to indicate for some of our on-going programs how often they should be reviewed so that we can ensure there were no changes upstream that stopped the query from pulling participants
  • Versioning - we often will clone and tweak a program. It would be helpful to have a field for version rather than relying on naming convention

Huge +1 to all of the above!

Labels would be massively helpful in cutting down on the sub-folder nightmares. It’d be so much easier to go to one folder for all of our programs that run on a recurring basis (or for a particular topic) and then filter them by their label, rather than trying to search for a specific program.

The “review frequency” label idea is brilliant. Not every program needs to be reviewed every week, but some absolutely should.

Versioning -- YES. Adding a “v1” to a program gets messy, especially if it has to be cloned and restarted -- also when there are A and B variants for testing. Not to mention, being able to keep the same program name and change the versioning label should allow for easier reporting!


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings