Problem: Custom fields added to the task layout is displayed on ALL tasks. Solution: Admin configured task layouts based on CTA Type and/or Timeline Activity Type.Activity Timeline Example Use Cases:1. The CSM adds a task from a ‘Risk’ activity timeline type, I would like to be able to configure a custom task layout that only links to the ‘Risk’ activity timeline type and allows the CSM to capture ‘risk’ related information in the custom admin configured task fields. 2. The CSM adds a task from an ‘Update’ activity type, then the admin configured task layout could be more simple. Maybe just a description field along with the standard defaults.Same for CTA’s…CTA Type Example Use Case:1. The CSM creates a Customer Goal and also creates a CTA and links the CTA to the Customer Goal record. The CSM chooses ‘Customer Goal’ as the CTA type. I would like to configure a custom task layout that is only linked to the ‘Customer Goal’ CTA type. Summarize:Admin configured task layouts based on CTA Type and/or Timeline Activity Type would create an overall improved user experience when customization is needed at the task level within each organization.
The Object Dependency feature needs significant improvement to be truly useful for admins.First, the dependency view must allow filtering of dependent rules based on meaningful criteria such as: Active / Inactive Scheduled / Not Scheduled Read vs Write dependencies Without this, it’s extremely difficult to identify which rules are actually impacting an object versus those that merely reference it.Second, the Object Dependency feature still shows obsolete rules that no longer exist in the system, including older generation rules that pre-date the Horizon Rules Engine. This creates confusion and reduces trust in the dependency data, especially when we are performing cleanup or impact analysis.There is also a suggestion in this thread to rely on Analyzer, but unfortunately this is not a reliable alternative. In multiple cases, Analyzer does not surface correct or complete dependency information.For example:In our Gainsgiht instance, The “X” field on the Person object is actively used in several rulesEven after repeatedly refreshing the Data Flow Diagram, Analyzer does not show the respective rules at all. This is just one example among many.Additionally, earlier this week I attempted multiple times to refresh the Data Flow Diagram, but it did not refresh for at least four days, further limiting its usability.As admins, we need a reliable, accurate, and filterable way to identify dependencies before making changes to objects or fields. Today, neither Object Dependencies nor Analyzer fully meets that need.
One of the challenges our organization faces has been determining how long in the case process it takes for a customer to start becoming frustrated. With StaircaseAI’s ability to detect negative sentiment combined with it’s integration with Salesforce Service Cloud cases, I’d love to see the ability to do reporting based on the case opened date to the date of the detected frustration. We currently collect this kind of data with CSAT surveys at case closure, but that doesn’t give us insight into the moment when sentiment starts to plummet. We’d love to provide our support and engineering organization with data that shows customer expectations in order to set performance goals around those targets. While I’m specifically talking about cases, I think it would be equally useful for other date based analysis. I could see it being used for future opportunity tracking integration, escalation management processes, or even basic analysis of customer age and/or lifecycle stages.
Hello!We have been in the process of moving to PX from another analytics provider and adjusting our flows to meet our internal and customer’s needs. One thing that our customers often ask for is recurrent usage reporting for their employees on our products. On previous providers this was fairly simple to do on a password protected externally facing page. On PX there is no external reporting functionality at all. Our work around was to create a pipeline to push the granular usage data into CS (no small feat) and use the Shared Spaces to make the reports externally facing. But come to find out there is no way for the end user to download the report?!This seems like a bit of an oversight, I recognize that not all reports shared with customers should have default download capability, but there should absolutely be an option in the UI to enable external download from the Shared Spaces.PLEASE add this feature!! Thank you!!
Has Gainsight considered the use-case for dynamic content over variants? There are some instances where it would be great to be able to have blocks of content that change within an email, where everything else stays the same. Dynamic content blocks could be referenced multiple times across many email templates.For example - the footer is localized for regional addresses. The same block would be used across all emails, and only need to be built with filters that are defined once. Instead, I have to create many duplicates of a variant, add the filters to each variant, even if all of the other content remains the same, it’s very inefficient. Given the restraint on the number of variants currently supported, I’ll run out quickly when I have both content and footer changes to account for regions and languages.
I have run into scenarios where I need to log an email through gainsight assist but because of the files attached that are images on an email signature that are too large I can’t log the email. I have to forward the email to myself and remove the file attachments to log the email.Can we have an option to remove files? I know there is a ask for letting large files through, but what about just allowing us to remove the files or certain files? Can that be an option?
Hi all, I would be nice to be able to export an excel from one specific topic. By this i mean: List of all replies from one specific topic and see: who wrote what (name, mail address, customer number, reaction, rank) Why do i want this? For example: I have a topic on my community were people can apply for something. I want to have a list in excel so i can e-mail al of them And now i have to make a list manually and check over 100 accounts to get their mail address Takes a lot of time!
It is mentioned that by default, posts are moderated without user notifications and that our community team can notify authors via the Notify Authors button in the Control… but it does not do the same for when a post is approved and posted. Would love a way to automatically notify the author when their post is approved and published with the AI Moderation Agent turned on
I have been testing the Community-to-case feature in the CC Salesforce integration as a potential workflow for routing community questions internally, and I discovered that after the case is created, the integration does not fill in the customer contact & account from Salesforce even if the community user is linked to a contact. I verified with support that this is “working as designed.” I get that there may be instances when the wrong contact is matched, but the amount of extra work required to manually add the contact after the fact makes this feature far less useful. Please consider at least adding an option to the integration settings to let customers decide whether or not they want to associate the contact to the case.
I’m not sure if this is a recent change and it seems that it is, but even if not what possible reason is there to clip the rule names and then have all this blank space next to it? I use a wide monitor, but this is a window taking up only half my screen. It looks the same on my smaller laptop. This is not a screen resolution problem, this is a design problem.This kind of design does not seem to indicate the users experience is considered at any point, but instead some arbitrary aesthetic. @ophirsw I know you’ve seen my various posts on whitespace and I’m sure are thrilled to see another :) I don’t search these things out and I’m not particularly jazzed about writing these but it seems that this issue of gratuitous whitespace at the expense of product usability seems to keep happening. Is there a better way we can communicate how inconvenient these changes are? Is there some other method we can employ that will have a substantive impact on the way these changes are considered to better take the user into account before implementing? Not trying to be dramatic, but more and more screens we jump to are getting increasingly irritating to use. Thanks :)
On C360 we tend to use a lot of different tabs where the scrolling from left to right (multiple clicking) becomes tedious even though theres a 3 button option to see all and scroll down. The request is to add an additional row on C360 for the tab list to have a more overall view of all tabs on one page or as much as possible. 20-30+ Tabs but would like it a singular view or condensed view to see all tabs available for 2 or multiple rows of C360 tabs stacked on each other.
Hi all,I noticed several CSS properties are not recognized by the custom CSS interface and result in an error that prevents publishing.So far, I’ve found the following unrecognized properties:aspect-ratio gap row-gap webkit is also not recognized Idea:Instead of preventing publishing how about a warning with the option to “Publish Anyway” Thanks!
Gainsight AI (ex: AI Cheat Sheet) can summarize useful customer context (timeline highlights, NPS/CSAT, open cases, key activities, etc.), but CTAs and Playbooks don’t currently have a way to pull this information in. In practice, that adds admin time and increases the chance that the CTA is completed without the right prep.Feature requestEnable CTAs and Playbooks to reference and display an AI-generated summary inside: CTA description/body Playbook step text (Optional) a “Context” panel on the CTA itself Ideally this would be a dynamic token/field, for example: {{AI_CHEAT_SHEET_SUMMARY}} Or a configurable “Insert AI Summary” option that injects the latest summary at CTA creation time, and optionally refreshes on open. Why it matters / Impact Reduces “research time” per CTA (especially exception-based CTAs like cadence calls, renewals, risk follow-ups) Improves quality and consistency of outreach because the relevant context is right in front of the CSM Less CTA fatigue and fewer missed details
We have a need to collaborate on Success Plans were multiple users are completing work and want visibility into the progress against CTAs and Timeline Activities. Those Timeline Activities should be visible on multiple Relationships / Companies, but according to ticket 308212, if a Timeline activity is created on the Success Plan, it can only be associated to CTAs by design. Please address this product gap.
Good morning! With other versions of community software I have managed, it was possible to post an image that would also double-up as a clickable hyperlink to another page; so for example, the BB Code would be: [ url=websiteexample.com][ imageexample][ /url] Of course, when you click on an image using the InSided software, this creates a full-size image view pop-up, so I understand why this wouldn't work, but it would be a 'nice to have' feature if there was a why to do this? Thanks, Sam
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK