Skip to main content
Discovery

Improve formatting / look of C360/R360 attributes section

Related products:CS C360 & R360 & P360
  • hitesh_sharma
  • sherry_fields
    sherry_fields

nadav_shemtov
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 96 replies
This is feedback from HPE ADM CSMs: 

Currently, the "Attributes" section in C360/R360 is very bland.  It's difficult to work with and actually trafck key attributes. 

The request would be to enhance the formatting options for this sections, allowing admins to higlhlight specific fields, bold text, change column widths and field sizes, etc. 

4 replies

manu_mittal
Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Gainsight Employee ⭐️
  • 639 replies
  • January 24, 2017
Nadav - I agree that we could make that section better. Not sure I understand why field sizes need to be configurable, though. Also, couldn't we leverage the summary section for things that have to be highlighted? Would love to better understand what exactly is cumbersome.

Thanks!

nadav_shemtov
  • Author
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 96 replies
  • January 26, 2017
Hi Manu, 

The request was to improve the overall formatting of this section. 
Specifically, the ability to create sections / groups of field, add titles / section headers, or give different fields different formatting to indicate different levels of importance. 

Summary is great but has limited number of fields, and there are many instances where attribute section gets really long and doesn't look appealing as it's just a list of fields. 

liam_nicholls
Also having the ability to have three or four columns could also be useful.

mark_b5a12a
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 12 replies
  • November 3, 2017
In addition to the good suggestions above, you could improve the default formatting for checkbox fields. It's a very light gray box with a white check - very low legibility. 

Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings