Skip to main content
New Idea

Ability to survey randomly

Related products:None
kiranpanigrahi
anirbandutta
kathleenkenny23
revathimenon
  • kiranpanigrahi
    kiranpanigrahi
  • anirbandutta
    anirbandutta
  • kathleenkenny23
    kathleenkenny23
  • revathimenon
    revathimenon

andrew_cummins
It would be awesome to tell a powerlist to select 75% of the users and contacts randomly and survey them. This helps to prevent Gaming of the system for some surveys. Right now we have to set up a few powerlists based off an account attribute like account name starts with A-M survey the primary contact and account name starts with N-Z survey the secondary contact. Then we have to go in and change this on a quarterly basis if we want to adjust the "random" nature of the survey. 

7 replies

andrew_cummins
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Author
  • Helper ⭐️
  • 270 replies
  • August 19, 2016
It doesn't have to be 75% it can be any percent but the ability to choose how many to randomly survey is the idea. 

karl_rumelhart
Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 460 replies
  • August 19, 2016
This is a very cool idea, Andrew.  Will think about it. 

andy_sackley
  • Helper ⭐️
  • 16 replies
  • August 22, 2016
Added my vote. Would be especially useful for support surveys - particularly as case volume grows and you do not need to hit every case closed to get a valid sample size!

gaurav_kotak
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 378 replies
  • August 25, 2016
Great idea Andrew. Instead of relying on alphabets, do you think you can create a SFDC formulae field to capture the randomness? 

andrew_cummins
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Author
  • Helper ⭐️
  • 270 replies
  • August 26, 2016
Have not explored that but if
requires a SF Admin I am unable to do it and would have submit it to my SD
admin team. It would be great if we could have this flexibility in Gainsight so
I do not need my SF Admins


gaurav_kotak
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 378 replies
  • August 26, 2016
Got it. Yes you'd require SF admin to do it. This is currently planned functionality at least for Q4. Next year we'd want to look at A/B testing more broadly and that should have tenets of randomization so we'll look to directly address this use case as part of that initiative. 

alizee
Forum|alt.badge.img+12
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 659 replies
  • March 28, 2023

@anirbandutta Can you shed some light on this one? I see that’s 6 years old with a mention that it was planned for Q4 six years ago? Where are we with this and who can we talk to about it?


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings