Skip to main content
seth
Expert ⭐️
Aug 4, 2021 4:25 PM UTC
Question

Picklist GSIDs / Values in NXT

When viewing participants in a JO, picklist GSIDs are shown, when those picklists are mapped as custom fields. Those should be the human-readable picklist value. I don’t believe an Object exists in NXT that allows you to look up the GSIDs of picklist values.

 

 

 

 

10 replies

Helper ⭐️
Aug 4, 2021 5:34 PM UTC

We have been seeing this recently as well and it appears to be new behavior as of a recent release/update… Our Boolean fields also switched from uppercase TRUE/FALSE to lowercase true/false. (Shown are some old participants and some recently added)

 

Translate
Anastassia Goidina
darkknight
Expert ⭐️
Aug 19, 2021 1:13 PM UTC

This was true with MDA picklists in SFDC edition also (and affects rules as well,) but it is an even bigger one in NXT where we can create custom fields on core objects.

 

I’ve raised this a few times with Product and walked away with the understanding that it wasn’t a priority because it would require a lot of effort to solve and that we could just use a Case Expression to translate.

That’s not a good solution, especially if you have numerous picklist options or (heaven forbid) multi-picklist.  And to your point, you would have to know the GSID of the values...which is not easy to figure out especially if there are values no one has selected before.

 

Translate
Jeff Kirkpatrick
darkknight
Expert ⭐️
Dec 20, 2021 2:01 PM UTC

@rakesh it’s a systemic issue...

Translate
Jeff Kirkpatrick
anirbandutta
Expert ⭐️
Feb 18, 2022 5:47 AM UTC

@rakesh , @pgeorge pinging to get on your radar

Translate
It's an opportunity for engagement
jparker
Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Jul 8, 2022 1:55 PM UTC

For the JO use case, this is already solved and the relevant field should be mapped as a Custom Field with data type Dropdown, instead of String

Thanks to @KiranNadukula for pointing this out

Translate
Looking for my next role: Gainsight Lead / CS Ops Product Council Member. Let's connect: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jon-parker/
spencer_engel
Expert ⭐️
Sep 8, 2022 2:43 PM UTC

I wouldn’t call this solved. There are still plenty of areas in the product where this is a problem, including relationship associated object mapping.

Translate
kelly
Helper ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Aug 7, 2023 4:18 PM UTC

@anirbandutta can you remove the Solved status of this post? Especially given the merge of 3 other threads, this is absolutely not solved for. Picklists still display GSID values in exports and rule results (the first merged thread is from four years ago and still not solved for or prioritized)/

Translate
alizee
VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Aug 7, 2023 5:15 PM UTC

@anirbandutta can you remove the Solved status of this post? Especially given the merge of 3 other threads, this is absolutely not solved for. Picklists still display GSID values in exports and rule results (the first merged thread is from four years ago and still not solved for or prioritized)/

Also, multi select pick lists are still an issue and they’re a big one at that. 

Translate
The most expensive part of building is the mistakes. That's true in construction. Not so much in CSOps. So ask questions, make mistakes and learn. All views expressed here are my own.
anirbandutta
Expert ⭐️
Aug 8, 2023 12:15 PM UTC

I changed that.

Getting some PM eyes on this thread.

Translate
It's an opportunity for engagement
spencer_engel
Expert ⭐️
Feb 11, 2025 8:15 PM UTC

Can we please get eyes on this again? I’m testing a new solution that populates a picklist field on the Company object, and the test results are borderline unreadable because of all the GSIDs that are populated instead of the true string value

Translate