Skip to main content
ashley_foster
ashley_foster
Contributor ⭐️
May 16, 2017
New Idea

Ability to add chart titles to the graphs in the reports

  • May 16, 2017
  • 7 replies
  • 109 views
It would be great to be able to add the 'show me' fields as titles under the graphs in the reports. I compare two sets of data often and embed these graphs in the C360 and users do not have the ability to clearly look at what the data is unless they hover over it. It seems like an easy enough enhancement that would be very helpful when reporting multiple data points. 

      7 replies

      darshana.shah
      darshana.shah
      Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
      January 18, 2021

      I 100% agree. When getting into complex data analytics, It would be easier if we had the ability to add titles to the X and Y axis. I run into wanting to label show me or by field and not all have the option to configure alias. 

      Darshana Shah
        gunjanm
        gunjanm
        Expert ⭐️
        January 19, 2021

        Surprised this hasn’t gained more traction over three years...thanks for resurfacing @darshana.shah I completely agree.

          
        End Proctoring-
         
        Gunjan
          bradley
          bradley
          Expert ⭐️
          January 19, 2021

          Adding another comment here to boost visibility. I agree this would be useful. @darshana.shah @gunjanm should the label inherit any display name editing done on show me fields, or should it allow editing but be independent?

          gunjanm
          gunjanm
          Expert ⭐️
          January 20, 2021

          @bradley I would say following suit of what happens in Rules Engine should be the standard across the board. i.e. if I’m looking at the Success Plan object and I grab the GSID, it’s called GSID. But if I do a lookup to the Company GSID, it defaults the label to Company GSID automatically, but still allows for me to override the friendly label. I believe this behaviour should be the mimicked everywhere (Report Builder, Data Designer, 360 Layouts...) as it should really be a single experience; not needing me to know or verify when I need to rename a field because the default in this part of the platform is completely different from the part I was just in. Data Designer is the one that always gets me...manually relabelling all of the GSIDs, and with “tab” not working well to navigate between the fields. Could be such a better experience. 

            
          End Proctoring-
           
          Gunjan
            bradley
            bradley
            Expert ⭐️
            January 20, 2021

            @bradley I would say following suit of what happens in Rules Engine should be the standard across the board. i.e. if I’m looking at the Success Plan object and I grab the GSID, it’s called GSID. But if I do a lookup to the Company GSID, it defaults the label to Company GSID automatically, but still allows for me to override the friendly label. I believe this behaviour should be the mimicked everywhere (Report Builder, Data Designer, 360 Layouts...) as it should really be a single experience; not needing me to know or verify when I need to rename a field because the default in this part of the platform is completely different from the part I was just in. Data Designer is the one that always gets me...manually relabelling all of the GSIDs, and with “tab” not working well to navigate between the fields. Could be such a better experience. 

              
            End Proctoring-
             

            That makes sense. I was curious if you think the label should be editable independent of how you’ve changed the show me field label. I think consistency though is super important throughout the product.

            rakesh
            Gainsight Employee ⭐️
            rakesh
            Lets put your data to work!
            January 22, 2021

            Hi All,

             

            This is a great idea overall and I’d like for it to have some votes too. I’ll explore more on how we can solve it. That being said, would you be able to add an image or any inputs on what is enough? 

             

            Thanks for the feedback on the fieldpath and names @gunjanm . CC: @srinivas_muthyam 

              gunjanm
              gunjanm
              Expert ⭐️
              January 23, 2021

              @bradley definitely needs to be editable but you’re right, consistency! 

                
              End Proctoring-
               
              Gunjan
                Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement