Skip to main content
New Idea

Can we get license type filter show up in Permissions Bundle rules

Related products:CS Authentication & User Management
  • March 10, 2021
  • 11 replies
  • 191 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+2

Hello Team,

 

Can we get license type filter show up in Permissions Bundle rules

11 replies

narayanan_s
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • March 10, 2021

License Type is a necessary filter at permission bundles to ensure active users who are assigned with Full or Viewer license matches the count between licensed users count on user management.

Currently we could not cross verify whether licensed active users does enabled with a permission bundle or not. There is also no report facility for admin users to know the permission bundles assignment.

Adding license type as filter condition would help to understand how many licensed users are assigned with permission bundle rather not just hold entire active users on it.


reneehouse
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • March 10, 2021

+1


darkknight
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Expert ⭐️
  • March 11, 2021

Would love to get this converted to an idea.

@narayanan_s  to your latter point: 

 


sai_ram
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Expert ⭐️⭐️
  • March 16, 2021

Would love to get this converted to an idea.

@narayanan_s  to your latter point: 

 

@darkknight converted to idea and redirected too. Thanks!!


soumitrasahu
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️
  • March 17, 2021

@Srikanth  Could you let me know what use case you are talking about?

Currently, you can assign Permission Bundles to only Full users. Even adding License type as a filter may not be required as we pass only Full users by default into the rules.

 


narayanan_s
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • March 17, 2021

@Srikanth  Could you let me know what use case you are talking about?

Currently, you can assign Permission Bundles to only Full users. Even adding License type as a filter may not be required as we pass only Full users by default into the rules.

 

Hi @soumitrasahu, Initially, I thought all active users are part of Permission bundle rule assignments. If only full licensed active users being part of permission bundles, we still don’t have option for bringing in viewer licensed active users for other view permission bundles but then to stay default with system generated “view_group” alone. 


soumitrasahu
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️
  • March 17, 2021

@narayanan_s Viewer Licensed Users can have only one Permission Bundle (VIEW_GROUP). That’s how we have developed this license. Are you looking for some special permissions for the Viewer licensed users? Could you please let me know for which specific areas you want to assign permissions to a Viewer Licensed user?


narayanan_s
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • March 17, 2021

@soumitrasahu no specific use case for now on adding special permissions for viewer license but I understand it is all system controlled than individual customer specifics after your inputs.

Here are the solutions then,

  1. view_group permission bundle only for viewer.
  2. Full user licensed assigned active users only be part of other than view_group permission bundle assignments.
  3. Unlicensed active users will not be part of permission bundles assign rules.

mbond
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • June 28, 2024

This functionality is really missing, wish it can be implemented! 


jenlpro
Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Helper ⭐️
  • September 26, 2025

Now that we can modify the default bundle for Viewer / Viewer + Analytics users, it’d be really nice to be able to have multiple Viewer + Analytics bundles which we could provision based on License Type + X criteria. 

Also, we’ve found several instances where we provision new users via SCIM to Viewer + Analytics, and no permission bundle is auto-applied, so we have to go manually apply it. Setting up explicit rules in Permission Bundles to put users with Viewer + Analytic License Type into that bundle would be highly beneficial to automatically catch these gaps 👀


darkknight
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Expert ⭐️
  • July 7, 2026

@revathimenon May we get the appropriate PM to have a look at this? 

I’m not sure why the automatic assignment rules are limited to only these fields.  There could be other user values upon which we want to base auto assignment rules, including License Type.

It seems like a no brainer to give us more flexibility in dynamic PB assignments.