Yikes! This could cause some BIG problems unless it’s resolved.

This is the request I should have made months ago, @darkknight to the rescue!

@anirbandutta not sure which product team this would go to, but may we get this to the right folks? thx!

Let me look up the team and try to get an acknowledgement.

@anirbandutta @rakesh any status on this?

I just got hit by this AGAIN. 

Missed a RTR that had a dependency on a field we were changing the values for and it created a recurrent vacating of the field value.

@Kenneth R may you help get some PM eyes on this? Thank you

Hi @darkknight - I’m checking with the teams.

@Kenneth R any update?

+1 on including RTR in dependency checks.  There are other areas of Gainsight that aren’t included in dependency checks (looking at you, playbooks..) - I think dependency checks across the platform as a whole could do with some tlc.

Thank you, submitted a ticket for this issue and it was suggested to post an idea and found this one that is 21 months old . RTRs are not considered dependencies by Analyzer either and this limitation is not called out anywhere in the documentation...I was told in the ticket that “I have also requested our product team to update the same in the documentation to avoid any future confusion" but leaving these caveats here just in case somebody else encounters this gap.

PS: I’m updating the ticket with the link to this idea 

this!

Sounds like another #platformparity issue.