Skip to main content
New Idea

Playbooks - Better filtering or limiting view

Related products:CS Rules Engine

heather_hansen
We have 2 main teams using GS, and we are about to add 2 more. As we include additional teams, the number of playbooks continues to grow. Would be great if there was a way to either:

a)Better find only the playbooks the user wants to see. For instance, we're adding a team acronym at the beginning of the playbook name. Would be good for user to be able to type that into a search field when adding a playbook and only see those playbooks.

b)Introduce some sort of option to determine who can see which playbooks as options.

If there's an option that I missing that would help make it easier, I would love to hear about it. 🙂

3 replies

seth
Forum|alt.badge.img+7
  • Gainsight Employee ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 550 replies
  • March 2, 2016
I saw on the last Product Roadmap webinar that the Gainsight interface is getting an overhaul, and I agree that the Playbook interface makes an awful use of space, and filtering would be a boon. Hope that it gets strong treatment in that overhaul 🙂

lila_meyer
Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Gainsight Employee ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 1447 replies
  • March 7, 2016
Heather, you aren't missing anything in terms of functionality available today. The Playbooks are organized by CTA type and you don't have another option. It seems like folders, similar to the way Vault assets are organized, would be useful to have under Cockpit > Playbooks, as well as Cockpit > CoPilot > Email Templates?

heather_hansen
Forum|alt.badge.img+13
  • Author
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 954 replies
  • March 7, 2016
Hi Lila,

That would definitely work for Admins, but in terms of the CSM, ideally, it would be great to have a way to just filter to the playbooks they need to see; whether that be search capability or start typing and it pulls those up, etc. I think the folders would be a good option if you could set permissions for who could see playbooks in that folder. It would be hard for us to do that by person, but if there was capability to do that by groups maybe? I'm just throwing things out here off the top of my head. 🙂 Would be happy to provide a more detailed use case if it will help.

Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings