Allow more than 26 filters in a rule
Is this something that is being evaluated?
As a workaround I guess that we could create a data space and put some of the criteria in the data space and some in the rule.
Attaching an example powerlist.
Or as a workaround, you can try out bionic rules with two steps where you can split the filters in both the tasks.
There's not an attribute that all these CSMs have in common, in this case, other than the size of their book of business. (I've already asked support to help me, too, and they haven't thought of anything.) The only way I can think of to get what I want is to split it into two separate reports, which isn't ideal.
1) Multiple OR conditions - OR impact the performance hugely
2) Hitting the limits of filter condition- For every filter value A, B, C consuming a filter
3) Usability & Readability: Impacting the usability & readability of the filter conditions.
Consolidating all of this, allowing multiple values of a field makes much more sense and should be handled across the product (Ex:Reporting, Rules & Co-pilot). Will get this into Product managers radar.
Sundar's suggestion on using Data space makes sense and would eliminate the need to define same filters again and again!
+6Can we change this to an idea post? This came up in support today. With the activity here it seems like this is something people run into some times.
+3+1.
While working with a customer I faced the same scenario.
+1
+3This is huge for us as our product count is high and to be able to filter for specific products would be helpful in so many aspects of reporting and rules engine. Right now we have to create 2 different rules or reports just to incorporate all of the products we are looking to report. I think the need is here and there is no other way around it.
+4+1 I ran in to the same issue in reporting today.
We are trying to narrow the list by including titles that include general keywords and after A-Z it messed up my filter logic and would not allow me to add more filters. I dont think we need anything extravagant like 100 but i think even 40 or 50 limit might be useful. I always try and condense my filters as much as possible and use better logic to lower when possible but this cause a pretty big headache. I can see it happening with some other reports and would like to have them added there as well.
+1Hi
We do have includes operator in Reporting Filters which allows for multiple values to be added to a single filter. Is there any challenge with what we have today?
Reply
Sign up
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Welcome to the Gainsight Community
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.