Skip to main content
New Idea

'Do not update CTA' option in Create CTA action for Open CTA Rules

Related products:None
faust_belarmino
  • faust_belarmino
    faust_belarmino

davebrown2242

Recently we ran into automation issues around creating Risk CTAs off new Health Score measures that present risk. I was caught off guard that the ‘Create CTA’ action in Rules Engine updates previously created CTAs (i.e., Priority is reset to High if downgraded to Low by CSM) if included in the fetch.

Love that the rule will not create duplicate CTAs if there is already a CTA created. It should be easier to prevent rules from updating existing CTAs. A checkbox option such as ‘Include in Identifiers’ on the Create CTA action for ‘Do Not Update Open/Existing CTA’ would save Admins a lot of time in building/testing Risk Framework CTA Automations. {Where open CTA with Identifier Criteria are found for the account - do not action}.

Workaround in place is to count up the Number of Open CTAs for that Type, Reason and where Status Reporting Category = Open.  On the Create CTA action add criteria for ‘Num Open CTA != Null’. HOWEVER this is not a good fix as we have crafted our Open Aging Cases, Service Project, and Invoicing rules to be many-to-one. (Many cases, invoices, projects can be at risk for one customer)

Guess it is better to at least have 1 Risk CTA on the topic than having our rules revert CSM/AM/RM work being actioned on CTAs.

 

Who is with me on this one?

6 replies

darkknight
Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Expert ⭐️
  • 1980 replies
  • March 19, 2021

:100:


heather_hansen
Forum|alt.badge.img+13
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 954 replies
  • March 19, 2021

Agree.  Would be great to be able to select whether you want a new one or an update or neither. 


davebrown2242
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Author
  • Helper ⭐️
  • 179 replies
  • March 19, 2021

This might be a great way to quickly implement this request.  

‘Do Not Update Existing CTA’


davebrown2242
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Author
  • Helper ⭐️
  • 179 replies
  • March 19, 2021

@sai_ram - just for you to :eyes: - Happy Friday


sai_ram
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Expert ⭐️⭐️
  • 3727 replies
  • March 19, 2021
davebrown2242 wrote:

 

@davebrown2242 Happy Weekend!! 

I like the way you describe the problem statement and that’s great to hear the the workaround too. We have few plans for rules engine redesign, hope this should be considered. 

 

 


sriram pasupathi

@davebrown2242 That definitely makes sense. We will be adding real time rules support for CTA action in the near term. We will make this enhancement as a part of that. Thank you.


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings