Skip to main content
Open

Show Actual Record Count in Execution Log Overview (Horizon Rules)

Related products:CS Rules Engine
scott_superko
dan
svaughangainsightcom
gabriel_hobbs
joshua
+2
  • scott_superko
    scott_superko
  • dan
    dan
  • svaughangainsightcom
    svaughangainsightcom
  • gabriel_hobbs
    gabriel_hobbs
  • joshua
    joshua
  • sean_wilson
    sean_wilson
  • kara_kogelman_e30d43
    kara_kogelman_e30d43

bradley

I was doing some comparison between a Bionic Rule and a Migrated Horizon version of it and thought I had encountered a problem:

 

Bionic Rule execution history record count:

 

Horizon Rule execution count:

I expected the same result, and on initial look thought there was something wrong with the setup so I went to download the HR logs to check, and discovered that on mouseover you get the actual numbers:

 

It may seem like a small thing, but not having the actual counts without mouseover really cuts into the great benefit of having the whole execution flow “at a glance” (well, unless you have more than three actions off a task).

 

It would be very helpful to have the actual record counts, not a rounded number, be visible in the execution history.

4 replies

romihache
Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 431 replies
  • May 12, 2023

Absolutely agree!
There is more than enough space to show the full number, having to go dataset by dataset hovering over them to see the actual count is inefficient when we could get the info we need at a glance.


matthew_lind
Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 651 replies
  • May 12, 2023

Oh yes….100% agree.

I’d benefit from understanding why behind the decision to use rounding, because perhaps there’s a compelling reason I’m overlooking.

Rounding makes sense in use cases where precision is less critical. However, running and troubleshooting rules is typically a very precise activity. I’ve had many occasions when I’m stepping through logs and noting “OK, I got 13,916 rows here, but in the next step I ended up with 13,901, so something happened to 15 rows that needs more research.”

 


TMaier
Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Helper ⭐️
  • 175 replies
  • May 12, 2023

I’m on board with this. Even a minor difference of a few records can be very meaningful depending on the rule, and I like to browse these over time to get a feel for the expansion in various objects. Rounding is too broad here and we don’t need it.


shambhawi
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Gainsight Employee ⭐️
  • 71 replies
  • May 17, 2023
No StatusAcknowledged

Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings