Skip to main content
New Idea

Multi-version support in playbook email tasks and email Assist

Related products:None
  • September 3, 2021
  • 9 replies
  • 130 views

stephanienardone

It would be great if Gainsight Assist and Playbooks supported multi-version email templates. We are rolling out Gainsight to our Client Success Managers that manage International accounts/clients that speak different languages where this is needed. As a work around, we set up a JO but there are some touch points where this would be helpful. Rather than having multiple individual email templates for each language, or a playbook for each language, we would like to group them.

9 replies

Cornelia
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • ProdOps
  • 335 replies
  • September 6, 2021

Hello @stephanienardone, thank you for your post. We’re glad to hear that you are extending Gainsight to your CSMs that manage international accounts. Looping in our Product Manager to take a look at this and suggest what best can be done here. 


  • Helper ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 347 replies
  • September 23, 2021

Hello  @stephanienardone 
We have this in our Email assist roadmap, only limitation would be you can only select and send one version from email assist as opposed to JO.


Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi @chethana ,
would you have an update on this? We are facing similar challenges in making email comms with customers more efficient with Gainsight, but having to readjust templates just for language does not really help with that :). Thanks!


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️
  • 9 replies
  • September 27, 2023

I would also love an update on this feature @chethana ! It’s very useful that you can now select different versions from within Gainsight Assist, but not being able to do so within a Playbook Task is still a big pain point for us as a multi-language company. Thanks!


Padolfi
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Contributor ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 26 replies
  • July 25, 2024

Hi @chethana

I saw that we can do this in email assist but not in the task. This is affecting us a lot since we now have lots of onbaording managers worldwide with high touch customers and they need to be able to talk in their specific language. 

They can use email assist as a workaround but it’s a fair amount of extra work and they need to remember where to do this even if they have the task. 

Ideally, the email would take the version that matches the language of the participant, this way it forces people to update the language of the contact to the correct one if it’s wrong. 


Stuart
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Helper ⭐️⭐️
  • 144 replies
  • July 25, 2024

Cross posting from https://communities.gainsight.com/ideas/variant-email-templates-in-email-assist-3089/index3.html?postid=44444#post44444:

 

Hey Gainsight,

 

We’re in the process of overhauling our email templates just now, and as part of our “engage the customer on their terms” initiative, our CSMs are translating email content for their region/language.

 

The thought was that, each email template would contain a version for each language and, if used in a playbook the CSM would then choose the template variant before previewing and sending to the customer.  I now understand this isn’t possible; email versions can be identified in JO via criteria, and a CSM can select the email template version required when sending an ad-hoc email, but not if the template is used as an email template as part of a playbook.

 

I ask myself ok, so this isn’t possible, what are the options? 

  1. The language needs to be defined in the CTA rule; requiring multiple email templates, multiple playbooks and multiple rule actions.
  2. The playbook task must be a task only (not an email task), requiring the CSM to send an ad-hoc email, and selecting the correct email version before previewing and sending.

 

Option 1 is horrible from an admin perspective; it requires the number of email templates to increase by a factor of n, where n is the number of languages templates have translations for, the same for playbooks and rule actions.  Email template and playbook assets become more burdensome to manage given their volume, and rules (I assume) take longer to process give the factor of n rule actions added to identify which language playbook/template/CTA version would need to be created.  Additionally, what happens when an additional language is supported? Instead of adding a version to each existing email template, a new template, playbook and rule action would need to be created.  Total madness.

Option 2 is horrible from the perspective of the CSM; if the majority of customers (and therefore customer communications) are in English, having CSMs read the CS Task, then have to manually add an ad-hoc email to the playbook, etc, etc is a bad experience for end-users.

Even a halfway solution (playbooks/CTA rule actions distinguishing between English/non-English) isn’t palatable for the admin experience, and would still provide a poor experience for end-users where English isn’t the primary language in their territory.

 

If email versions are supported in JO and ad-hoc emails, 1000% they should be supported in playbook tasks.  Am I understanding this wrongly?  If the need for email versioning was large enough for Gainsight to develop and release for JO and ad-hoc emails, surely a 360 solution should be developed so email versioning can be adopted throughout the whole product?

@ssamarth @mpatra

#productparity


dayn.johnson
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • VIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • 646 replies
  • July 25, 2024

@revathimenon, can we get some eyes on this? 👀

This is (yet) another #productparity issue. If we can use email versions in a couple areas (JO, email assist), it doesn’t make sense why versions wouldn’t be enabled in ALL areas. Especially since dynamic content blocks in email templates is still not available (this 4yo “open” idea).

This is a big issue because:

  • Increases the number of templates needed (directly tied to the number of languages used)
  • Increases amount of options in template list which increases likelihood of human error
  • Increases the complexity of logic in the task (ex: if participant’s preferred language is not set)

I’m sure there are other issues I’m not thinking of here.

Update:
(@Stuart, thanks for sharing the SIX-YEAR-OLD PARKED idea above that I’d already voted on)

How exactly is this parked with so many upvotes (94 as of now) and comments that it was on the roadmap and planned for a 2022 release at one point?

How are we expected to scale our digital CS programs, especially with international customers and CSMs, when email versions won’t work in playbooks?


zach_davis
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Helper ⭐️
  • 77 replies
  • September 23, 2024

@revathimenon Following up on this to see if you can get us an update on this functionality request?


revathimenon
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Gainsight Community Manager
  • 588 replies
  • October 1, 2024

Hey @dayn.johnson & @zach_davis - sorry i missed this. On it!


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings