+1 this would super helpful for me right now with migrating to NXT and having a lot of field changes in SFDC.
@bradley agree with you, this would really help in avoiding more clicks. We are in process of redesigning this page. I am sharing this feedback with the product team.
You are welcome to share more feedback on this.Thanks!!
@bradley agree with you, this would really help in avoiding more clicks. We are in process of redesigning this page. I am sharing this feedback with the product team.
You are welcome to share more feedback on this.Thanks!!
I mean, if you want to go next-level awesome, allow me to swap out a field of the same data type. If I want to migrate from Field A (old field) to Field B (new field) let me do it with a few clicks, and anywhere there was a dependency on Field A, it is now replaced with Field B. It might work with different data types, but that might be a version 2.0 thing. I’d be fine if this doesn’t happen in real-time, though that would be ideal.
@sai_ram Disappointing to see this is not on the road map at all.
@bradley I am sorry for disappointment, I will get the reason for this.
@All, I would request you to up-vote to show your interest.
@bradley We are working to make the dependencies tab UX simpler. However swapping of fields of same data type is something we are not looking at currently.
@bradley We are working to make the dependencies tab UX simpler. However swapping of fields of same data type is something we are not looking at currently.
Makes sense - the field swapping was really a separate request, but it would make things much easier for admins.
Not sure if this is still in your domain @ssamarth but I see that Data Management 2.0 includes an export option for dependencies which is rad.
Less rad is that the export contains cells with long lists of csv’s.
Application Area | Instance Name | Dependent Fields |
Rule | Rule_Name | Field1, Field2, Field3, Field4, etc. |
This isn’t super great for readability, meaning for each Instance Name you need to take a few extra steps to split the values on a comma and then turn the column of values into rows.
Would it be possible to have the export something more closely resembling this:
Application Area | Rule | C360 |
Instance Name | Rule_Name | LayoutName: Layout_Name |
Values (aka fields) | Field1 | Field1 |
Field2 | Field2 |
Field3 | etc. |
Field4 | |
etc. | |
For me at least, application area isn’t as important (I would be fine if the export concatenated Application Area and Instance Name into one field e.g. Rule: Rule_Name) but having each of the fields as a value in its own cell would make the export much more usable.
@anirbandutta or @Cornelia let me know if this should be its own request.
FYI: @darkknight @zach_davis
@anirbandutta @community-admin ?
Let me check back on the latest for this.