Within the SF object Survey Participant, Advanced Outreach Participant ID is a text field instead of an ID.
I was working with a customer who was trying to join Participant ID from AO participants(Number,MDA) to Advanced Outreach Participant ID(text,SFDC). This is preventing a join between the two fields within rules.
The only workaround we can think of is
- Create a Number field in Survey Participant object
- Populate all the data from AO participant ID (Text field in Survey participant) into this Number field
- Use this Number field in the Rules to map with the other Number field from AO Participants object
This would need to be done via some sort of SF process and not the rules engine.
Within Survey Participant object, create Advanced Outreach Participant ID as an ID field
+7
+1Alex, you have this slightly backward.
The issue is that the data type for the "Participant ID" in the AO Participant MDA table doesn't seem to be correct, and is in the MDA table as a "Number" type field, rather than an ID. In the Survey Participant object in Salesforce, the "AO Participant ID" is listed as a "GS ID" type field.
Merging these two tables with this ID as the common identifier outside of GS is possible, since in Excel, I can change the data type to make them both the same, but I believe that the fact that the ID is listed in the AO Participant object as a Number field is a mistake, and it should be changed to an ID type field.
Unrelated, but it appears there's a spelling error in the "AO Participant Created by" field (spelled "AO Particiapnt"). Makes me think that the field type for the Participant Id was also just a mistake.
The issue is that the data type for the "Participant ID" in the AO Participant MDA table doesn't seem to be correct, and is in the MDA table as a "Number" type field, rather than an ID. In the Survey Participant object in Salesforce, the "AO Participant ID" is listed as a "GS ID" type field.
Merging these two tables with this ID as the common identifier outside of GS is possible, since in Excel, I can change the data type to make them both the same, but I believe that the fact that the ID is listed in the AO Participant object as a Number field is a mistake, and it should be changed to an ID type field.
Unrelated, but it appears there's a spelling error in the "AO Participant Created by" field (spelled "AO Particiapnt"). Makes me think that the field type for the Participant Id was also just a mistake.
+1I wish I could like that Karl R. liked this comment 😉
+1Just want to add to this.... In the Flattened survey tables in the MDA, this same ID is stored as a "string" field (picture me beating my head on the desk).
I'm trying to tie the outreach participants to the survey results, and it seems the only way to do it is to export all these different tables with different data types to Excel to be able to control the data format.
I'm trying to tie the outreach participants to the survey results, and it seems the only way to do it is to export all these different tables with different data types to Excel to be able to control the data format.
+1Just in case anyone is watching this thread, with the migration to Survey 2.0, there is now an MDA object called "Survey Participant" that includes an AO Participant ID with the correct field type, (as opposed to the Salesforce "Survey Participant" object.)
Sign up
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Welcome to the Gainsight Community
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.