Skip to main content

    Idea Pipeline

    Filter by idea status

    Filter by product area

    6164 Ideas

    darkknight
    darkknightExpert ⭐️

    Enable SSL Link Tracking by default OR Provide clear best practicesNew Idea

    Background: I received reports of email participants complaining that the “links aren’t working” in emails sent from Journey Orchestrator. The links in the template (created by GS before I got here) were flagged for Link Tracking. These complaints have come in since we migrated to NXT (2 weeks ago), but I don’t know yet if that’s relevant or a coincidence.I learned through Support that we do not have SSL Link Tracking enabled for our tenant, which surprised me.  Why wouldn’t every tenant have this enabled?I’m not a marketing person nor am I a web security specialist, but it seems to me that if your hyperlink changes from https:// to http:// when Link Tracking is enabled on the link without having SSL enabled that would cause hyperlink issues for the majority of recipients whom I would expect would be security conscious and have robust firewalls that would be looking for such red flags.I did have one internal Gainsight person (whom I won’t identify) point me to this article as a reasoning case point for why its not enabled by default. TL;DR because survey links might be affected.Reading that article, though, (unless I’m misreading somehow) what I take away from it is:Gainsight thinks it's possible for us to go to each of our customers and tell them to add all those wildcard domains to their firewall (which is not possible, even though that doesn't apply to the situation I'm experiencing now) You can avoid the Survey link issue if you just follow Solution 2 (create a custom domain in Gainsight) for use with SurveysIf that’s the only reason SSL Link Tracking isn’t enabled by default, then I see no reason why SSL Link Tracking shouldn't be enabled by default.  Anyone know otherwise? I’m all ears.Bottom line, though, most Gainsight admins are likely not going to be marketing or web security specialists, so there should be more (and clear!) best practice support & documentation around this during both implementations AND upgrades to ensure the environment is set up for the best delivery experience, cause it’s a really big bummer when you have leaders coming to ask why stakeholders at large multi-national corporations are coming to tell us that our links are giving them this warning:  

    Molly.McQ
    Molly.McQHelper ⭐️

    Enable Gainsight CS Timeline Data Integration with Staircase AINew Idea

    Staircase AI currently does not factor in any data from the CS Timeline, which is a significant gap in communication intelligence and customer context. According to recent guidance from our Gainsight/Staircase Solutions Consultant:“Gainsight CS Timeline is not factored into Staircase at all. All communication is conducted based on Staircase integrations with email, meetings, tickets, and chat, if these are configured. You cannot currently manually enter calls, notes, or other communications into Staircase.”This was not made clear to us during onboarding. In fact, I incorrectly assumed Timeline data would be considered because it is such a foundational and expected capability in any native integration like this. Unfortunately, we later learned this isn’t the case, leaving a major blind spot in how Staircase perceives customer activity and sentiment. Staircase should support ingesting and analyzing CS Timeline data; at minimum, allowing structured notes and manually logged customer interactions to inform sentiment scoring, engagement patterns, and health insights.This would allow Staircase to factor in high-value interactions such as:Strategic conversations documented during QBRs/EBRs Risk escalations or renewal save actions and updates captured by CSMs Notes following non-digital customer engagements (e.g., calls or in-person meetings)While there are many benefits and use cases to support the prioritized implementation of this request, here are some key benefits to consider: Ensures sentiment and health scores reflect the full customer relationship (not just synced communication channels) Honors the critical strategic documentation that’s already happening in Timeline Reduces blind spots where accounts may appear disengaged despite high-value interaction  NOTE: This is an ongoing issue for us as we are constantly battling data sync issues due to Staircase incorrectly flagging these for no recent communications. This undermines the value of the tool and leads us to question the validity of Staircase insights.  Enhances Staircase’s utility for teams with mature Gainsight implementationsAgain, this is a very basic integration expectation for a tool that is supposed to analyze “all customer communication to accurately spot at-risk customers and make customer success automatic.” Why would we exclude and not consider Timeline updates and insights? If Timeline data is important to your teams customer intelligence, please upvote and share your use case.

    jenlpro
    jenlproHelper ⭐️

    Enable threading for automated email programs (JO/Digital Journey)New Idea

    The concern: We are building out our digital journey for our scale segment of customers, and are finding that many customers feel bombarded by email journeys that send separate communication threads for every touchpoint in a related journey.Additionally, sending a separate thread for each email within a program makes it feel very obvious that emails are automated and not human-touch. Allowing threading would allow us to build in some more human-like touches and follow-ups for our team without the need to actually intervene. This is especially helpful for our scale customers since our CSMs work in a pooled model.The ask: enable some feature that allows for us to configure email programs that send subsequent communications in the initial email thread so that customers have a single place to see all related messages. I think a boolean field would be the most user-friendly for admins, similar to the checkbox in settings to log outreach to timeline. (Bonus would be having this available alongside or after the functionality for timeline activities to be threaded!)“Workarounds” today: Our CSM was super helpful and provided some suggestions to give customers a better experience - however, they don’t entirely solve for our use case, but sharing in case they help some of you out:Add “Re:” as a prefix to the subject of subsequent emails to make it appear as if they’re threaded - this helps customers see that emails are related AND that they have received a prior communication about a particular topic; in some cases, users may not realize emails are not actually within a single thread. (Should out to ​@sarahmiracle who gave us the same suggestion in the Slack community! 👏🏻) This doesn’t solve for our use case because our customers are unhappy with the number of related threads in their inbox regardless of how they’re titled. Use a date field for “last communication sent” in GS to filter recipients out of messages/decrease the volume they receive in a given period - this is a good way to prevent scale customers from receiving too many emails BUT doesn’t work in our particular case because the communications are part of the same digital journey Use a different feature that supports threading for communications - other mass communication features in Gainsight do support threading, such as logging emails via Gainsight Assist from your inbox OR using Group Send to initiate and following up on communications from your inbox. This doesn’t support our scale use case because we want to automate multiple related touches, but is a great suggestion for viewing email threads from Gainsight for CSMs performing mass manual touches.Thanks for your attention here! Open to any other workarounds or suggestions folks have in the meanwhile - though I think our only other option is to use an alternate tool for this use case right now 😅