Skip to main content

    Idea Pipeline

    Filter by idea status

    Filter by product area

    6164 Ideas

    alizee
    alizeeVIP ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    Avoid remapping fields in versions/filters when updating Data Design source in Dynamic JONew Idea

    Hi all,I’m working on the transition of one of our programs to Dynamic JO while at the same time reworking the program’s reach / capabilities with the new features.Since at the date of posting, query builder isn’t back, I’m using data designer as a source and I’ve noticed that whenever I modify my data designer (because I face difficulties with some aspects of calculated fields) to add new fields (i.e. I converted my multi-select picklist “Roles” into a boolean as multi-select isn’t supported in calculated fields), Dynamic JO doesn’t notice / pick up the new fields I’ve added to the design. I have to delete the source, and re-add it for the fields to be picked up and available as tokens or filters in email versions. Even re-syncing the source doesn’t do the trick. The fields don’t show up automatically, which is causing several problems: All the pre-sets evaluate stages and calculated fields have to be updated All tokens in emails have to be updated All filters for email versions have to be updatedThis is quite a big waste of time when the design changes are to make up for the issue with multi-select picklists. Even in cases where it’s to accommodate something one’s forgotten as a field of importance, it creates a lot of extra work.I believe the change in behavior is also because we’re no longer mapping fields like we did in Advanced JO, but I believe a bit of an improvement is necessary here (even if it’s not necessary so straight forward). I’d like to make sure that fields available in the data design appear as you add them to the data design / space, provided said design has been re-run in DD. This would save a ton of time. Thanks!A

    darkknight
    darkknightExpert ⭐️

    CS Report Builder: Enable column level filtering in Show MeNew Idea

    Didn’t see a post on this yet (so if one exists please merge), but it would be great if in report builder we had a way to create a sub-filter on Show Me fields.Today in Report Builder, when you add multiple metrics (like the number of Risk CTAs and the number of Red accounts), they are calculated based on the same data set. This means every row in the report contributes to all the columns equally — even when those metrics are supposed to be counting different things.Basic example use case:   I need to create a report that shows, for each Customer Tier: The total number of CTAs with a Type = Risk The total number of Accounts with a Health Score = Red In Report Builder: Show Me: Count of CTA ID Count of Account ID Group by Tier Filter: Status = New, Work In Progress and Type = RiskBecause I can’t apply different filters to each column, both columns end up showing the same total count — even though I’m trying to measure two different conditions.So my report might look like this:Tier # of CTAs # of Accounts Tier 1 100 100 The first column shows all CTAs (not just Risk) The second column shows all Accounts (not just Red) When what I actually want is:Tier # of Risk CTAs # of RED Accounts Tier 1 100 45 If I could add a filter on the second show me field to only display the number of rows where Overall Score Label = Red, I could meet this need.  Instead, as a workaround I have to create two separate widgets (which take up space on Dashboard).There are more use cases for this, but this was just a basic demonstration. I talked to product team about this this morning.  They agreed this is a valid use case, but need more customers to VOTE and voice their opinion to get this prioritized on their roadmap.