The current Related Topics widget does not always surface the most relevant suggestions, and in some cases it seems to rely too heavily on keyword matching rather than true topic relevance with tagging. We would like the ability to better tune the widget so it shows more relevant content. Ideally, we should be able toprioritize threads with best answers, exclude specific content where needed, and adjust the matching criteria and favor tags instead of title matching.Having that level of control ourselves would be the best option, as it would make the suggestions more accurate, more useful, and better aligned with our community needs.
The current line wrapping behavior in code blocks can be confusing and can disrupt the layout. When a long code line wraps visually, it still keeps the same line number, which may not match user expectations. For users working with code, it would be helpful to have a clearer option to control wrapping, such as disabling line wrap or using horizontal scrolling by default for code blocks. This would make code easier to read and preserve formatting more predictably.
The current code formatting experience in the forum editor is hard to control. If code formatting is applied, it is difficult to exit, and there does not seem to be an easy way to remove or toggle it off once applied. The workaround requires multiple manual steps and it creates extra friction for users, especially in a developer community where inline code formatting is used frequently. We received the feedback from our members that they need to add a placeholder just to exit code formatting mid-text.A preferred way would be to add a clear and simple way to exit code formatting, toggle it off, or switch back to normal text without requiring multi-step workarounds.
Add a standard "resize handle" in the lower-right corner of rich text editor fields, allowing users to drag and resize the editing area as needed. Ideally, the editor would remember the user's preferred size during their current session.
In a user's notification settings, it would be good to have the option to also be notified for everything, whatever the subscriptions.
We have created a lot of segments to keep track of our audience / members. We use them to keep track of daily sign ups (only now in the launch period), but also ranks, active vs dormant users. But also create segments for user groups, how active people are etc. So also for reporting options. Because of this we also have created a lot of segments and thus groups so that we can order our segments properly. But because of all these segments, our segment page has become very long and not easy to search/look through. What would be very helpful is if we can open/close/expand a group within segments, sort of that it folds open (or close).
Currently the Zendesk Federated Search integration allows for advanced filtering by Category. Zendesk Categories are typically high level and then have “Sections” (what inSided would probably call Child Categories if we’re following the same structure and nomenclature). Similarly, clicking into a Section leads to a URL with /sections/[SectionID] (e.g. /sections/12497613). To allow for more detailed advanced filters, it would be very helpful if the Zendesk Integration also allowed for filtering by Section ID number, in addition to the existing Category ID number.
The MCP server currently appears to return only a search snippet for a topic, rather than the full conversation.We’d like the ability to fetch the entire topic/thread, including replies, so MCP-powered agents can do more than just surface partial matches.This would support use cases such as:Summarizing a full conversation Understanding the complete context and resolution Analyzing tone or sentiment across the discussion Recommending users who may be good resources based on the full content
The goal is to create an API request for bulk adding users as subscribers to a category. This would come in handy when creating user journey paths through various community engagement programs.
Hi there! At this point, we cannot review the history of all edits made to an email template. We can only see "Last Modified" and "Modified By" but not the trail of changes made to an email template since its creation or who made those changes. It would be extremely helpful if Gainsight Product Team would make it possible to see the audit log of all changes applied to an email template along with the datestamp and the username of who made those changes. Please consider adding this feature. Thank you!
Hi allFollowing an interaction with support and a recent silent JO failure, would like to request they please disappear altogether.Scenario:Data set A is modified because some parts of it are not relevant to a region, which impacts custom fields and how they’re used in version criteria Email version filters are forgetfully not remapped/removed - the field shows as blank in versions Program is set to publish later - everything works, it shows as “scheduled” At publication time, program reverts to draftYes it sends an email, but it should just not allow you to save (just like it doesn’t when you have forgetfully not mapped email tokens in some versions). When I publish for later, I need to know now that something’s missing at this very moment, with an error message like we get for email tokens not mapped. Not in the middle of the night because I’m not there and that is why I have published it for later.I would also argue the default email should send anyway.In short: no silent failures or later failures. If something’s wrong, it needs to be in our face immediately.Last rant of the week, thank you ;).
We came across an instance where CSM’s are creating manual lifecycle events on the account directly in Staircase, but they do not seem to count as an Insight within reporting. While we understand that the focal point of this process is for everything to be automated, having the ability to create a manual lifecycle event for a QBR, but not have it considered an Insight creates a gap in the event a call happens but is not present in Staircase.
A CSM brought a use case to me to allow pinning key attachments on the Attachments tab. I said the best bet is using Tags at this time, but I see the use case and thought I would drop it here.
I have a client request to be able to Pin things to the Timeline feature in GS. As timeline grows and grows it would be helpful to keep relevant documents pinned to the top of the page.
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.