Groups bring in targeted growth waves within the community 🏄🏼♂️All actionable KPIs welcome:Growth in membership within a time range: Numbers at a min, trend lines even better Growth in points: a common e.g. if I am to launch a Top-Member contest for a daterange Trending content Other Gamification usecases like categoriesAnd it does not all have to be exclusively available in the backend console… The leaderboard available on the UI.
It would be great for the modified date on the Success Plan to be based on max date of a timeline entry or CTA modification. We are trying to encourage CSMs to update the CTAs and Timeline entries to help us track how often they are interacting with the plan. Right now, the modify date only updates when you close the plan, which is not a true reflection of how often a CSM is interacting with the plan.
CSMs frequently track progress on big picture projects using the MSP tasks. Customers are allowed to edit existing CTAs, but not add new one themselves. Can we please look at changing permissions to grant selected customers the ability add new CTAs themselves? This makes progress check ins more seamless.
The ability to build a default welcome home page layout that would be the layout a new user sees the first few times they login (could set a timeline or number of logins) and once this time or number of logins expires, it would automatically switch to match the current home page layout for all users. Could simply be a sticky banner at the top that directs them to the welcome resources but once they’ve logged in a few times (or ignored/minimized the content) it no longer shows up for them on their home page view.
I need a way to help our employees find the questions that need a reply or a best answer from the front end. They can use the “help others” tab or “unanswered questions” at the top - but from there they have no way to sort. It’d be great if they could sort by category from either of those options.OR If the search page would add “unanswered” as a filter or “least replies” from the drop down, that’d work too.
For the Notification Center enhancement that’s in development, it would be ideal to have the ability to create custom notifications via the API. From CC Roadmap Update #29Notification Center enhancement coming soon
Hi! We’ve recently launched our KB in the community (which is great), with our team creating 170+ articles in a little over a week. I’d like to restrict these articles from showing up in the recently active feed, as they push all the questions way down the feed.
We would like to exclude certain content from the recently active feed. We create a lot of support content for our community. Every time we publish something, the contents appears in the recently active feed. Our users find this disturbing. Many other relevant topics slide down in the feed and are therefore overlooked. Moreover, we think dat most support content do not need to be displayed in the recently active feed …
First - I appreciate the work the GS product team has done in adding enhancements to JO and email templates, particularly the new pre-built template options.With that being said, as of now, there isn’t a way for us to start a new template draft using one of the system templates from any folder. Instead, the current process is Navigate to System Folder → Find the Template we want → Clone.Not only does this add unnecessary additional clicks, but the cloned template is added to the Uncategorized bucket and causes additional steps to ensure proper organization. Adding an option to the ‘Create a New Template’ window, or mimicking the new look of HRE templates, would help us begin using these in a quicker fashion.Option 1: Add a “System Template” drop-down to let us select one.Option 2: Separate “System Templates” as an option when clicking ‘New Templates’
There appears to be an inconsistency in how scorecard contribution weights are calculated when a measure value is null or zero.Currently, when a measure (e.g., Depth of Adoption) has a null value, its contribution is calculated as 0% instead of maintaining its assigned weight (e.g., 20%). Replacing the null value with 0 also changes the contribution calculation unexpectedly (e.g., recalculating to 50%), which can distort the overall scorecard output.This behavior may lead to misleading results, especially in scenarios where a measure is intentionally unreported, not yet available, or manually managed.Suggested Enhancement:Introduce an option or configuration setting that allows contribution weights to remain fixed (e.g., always 20%) regardless of whether the measure value is null or zero. This would ensure scorecard stability and prevent unintended recalculations due to missing or default values.
Problem: Custom fields added to the task layout is displayed on ALL tasks. Solution: Admin configured task layouts based on CTA Type and/or Timeline Activity Type.Activity Timeline Example Use Cases:1. The CSM adds a task from a ‘Risk’ activity timeline type, I would like to be able to configure a custom task layout that only links to the ‘Risk’ activity timeline type and allows the CSM to capture ‘risk’ related information in the custom admin configured task fields. 2. The CSM adds a task from an ‘Update’ activity type, then the admin configured task layout could be more simple. Maybe just a description field along with the standard defaults.Same for CTA’s…CTA Type Example Use Case:1. The CSM creates a Customer Goal and also creates a CTA and links the CTA to the Customer Goal record. The CSM chooses ‘Customer Goal’ as the CTA type. I would like to configure a custom task layout that is only linked to the ‘Customer Goal’ CTA type. Summarize:Admin configured task layouts based on CTA Type and/or Timeline Activity Type would create an overall improved user experience when customization is needed at the task level within each organization.
The Object Dependency feature needs significant improvement to be truly useful for admins.First, the dependency view must allow filtering of dependent rules based on meaningful criteria such as: Active / Inactive Scheduled / Not Scheduled Read vs Write dependencies Without this, it’s extremely difficult to identify which rules are actually impacting an object versus those that merely reference it.Second, the Object Dependency feature still shows obsolete rules that no longer exist in the system, including older generation rules that pre-date the Horizon Rules Engine. This creates confusion and reduces trust in the dependency data, especially when we are performing cleanup or impact analysis.There is also a suggestion in this thread to rely on Analyzer, but unfortunately this is not a reliable alternative. In multiple cases, Analyzer does not surface correct or complete dependency information.For example:In our Gainsgiht instance, The “X” field on the Person object is actively used in several rulesEven after repeatedly refreshing the Data Flow Diagram, Analyzer does not show the respective rules at all. This is just one example among many.Additionally, earlier this week I attempted multiple times to refresh the Data Flow Diagram, but it did not refresh for at least four days, further limiting its usability.As admins, we need a reliable, accurate, and filterable way to identify dependencies before making changes to objects or fields. Today, neither Object Dependencies nor Analyzer fully meets that need.
It is mentioned that by default, posts are moderated without user notifications and that our community team can notify authors via the Notify Authors button in the Control… but it does not do the same for when a post is approved and posted. Would love a way to automatically notify the author when their post is approved and published with the AI Moderation Agent turned on
I have been testing the Community-to-case feature in the CC Salesforce integration as a potential workflow for routing community questions internally, and I discovered that after the case is created, the integration does not fill in the customer contact & account from Salesforce even if the community user is linked to a contact. I verified with support that this is “working as designed.” I get that there may be instances when the wrong contact is matched, but the amount of extra work required to manually add the contact after the fact makes this feature far less useful. Please consider at least adding an option to the integration settings to let customers decide whether or not they want to associate the contact to the case.
On C360 we tend to use a lot of different tabs where the scrolling from left to right (multiple clicking) becomes tedious even though theres a 3 button option to see all and scroll down. The request is to add an additional row on C360 for the tab list to have a more overall view of all tabs on one page or as much as possible. 20-30+ Tabs but would like it a singular view or condensed view to see all tabs available for 2 or multiple rows of C360 tabs stacked on each other.
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.