Objective / SummaryCurrently, community admins can only hide individual categories, not entire sections. Additionally, the community APIs lack a parameter to indicate whether a category or section is hidden. We need the ability to completely hide or role-restrict entire sections in the UI, alongside API support that accurately reflects these visibility states.The Problem Administrative Overhead (UI): When we need to retire or temporarily hide an entire section, we are forced to manually drill down and hide every single category within that section one by one. This is tedious and inefficient. Data Inconsistency (API): Because the API does not return a "hidden" status parameter for categories or sections, there is a major discrepancy between what is configured in the backend and what the API pulls. This breaks custom integrations or external dashboards that rely on accurate content architecture. Proposed Solution Section-Level Controls: Add an option in the community backend to completely hide an entire section or restrict its visibility to specific user roles with a single toggle. API Visibility Parameters: Update the API payload to include a boolean parameter (e.g., "isHidden": true/false) for both sections and categories so external applications can respect the backend configurations. Business Value / Impact Efficiency: Saves administrative time when archiving content, restructuring the community, or managing seasonal/beta sections. Data Integrity: Fixes the inconsistency between backend configurations and API outputs, allowing developers to build reliable, seamless custom community experiences.
Hi Team We’ve received a request into support for the ability to restrict which Companies/Relationships automatically resolve from features such as GS Home Calendar Widget. For example, if a given tenant chooses to have a Company record for their own company, and list the users as Company Person records, the auto-resolution logic of features such as GS Home Calendar Widget to select that “Internal Company” for all calls where the majority of attendees are internal, because they are resolving as External Attendees instead of Internal Attendees. Furthermore, when changing the Company that was automatically resolved to the desired Company, this clears the External Attendees from the Timeline Activity due to the dependency checks in place. Because of this, having the wrong Company auto-select creates a lot of extra work for the users logging the timeline entries, and undoes a lot of the time saved by the design of these features. Thank you for your consideration!
The Weekly AI Digest is basically the first thing users see when they log into Staircase directly.Despite what this copy below says, according to Gainsight it evidently doesn’t matter what accounts you are assigned or, if you’re a manager, what accounts your reports are assigned, it will just summarize the business in general: As a first impression, given it also says it is *for me*, that’s neither super intuitive nor all that great an experience.I would like the ability to have the digest tailored to either the filters on my dashboard, or, at the very least, have the option somehow for it to do what it says on the box: have it related to ‘my’ accounts and/or those of my reports.
Sister ticket of I just converted to NXT (and yes I am open to accepting sympathies via DM) and now that we’ll be using Permission Bundles more, we MUST have a way to export and report on users assigned to Permission Bundles.When you have 2000+ users, the user display of 10 users at a time just does not cut it.
I think it would be very useful if every KPI that can be used on personalized dashboard shoul use logics set with general filters.They can show useful information for a quick view on a range of user/accoounts, but they are automatically excluded from the catalogue if I need to use just one filter.
One of the challenges we face in our community is relying on other tools to issue points and badges related to activities outside of the community. I would like to have the ability to issue points and badges in a simple and flexible via MCP. This skill will save hours of work.
I love being able to use Rule chains to tie rules that need to run in a specific order together under one common schedule. The problem I have is that may times a reporting Data Design is dependent on the Rule jobs finishing. We solve this by just offsetting the Data Design Execution time to run and hour after the Rule Chain finishes, but the amount of dependant schedules that we have is getting out of hand.It would be awesome to expand Rule Chains to a larger feature that could include Data Designs as part of flow so we can run some of these more complex workflows under a single schedule.
This feature request aims to automate the validity of the topics sitemap by including or excluding specific URL based on website indexing rules at post/topic level or category level.The idea is simple:All URLs with a 200 HTTP status code are included in the sitemap by default. (Already live) directories for categories and pages that have been set to noindex should be automatically excluded The sitemap is automatically generated and updated whenever there is a change in URLs, robots meta tagsThis improves SEO quality, reduces administrative overhead, and helps search engines crawl only content intended for indexing.
Is there a way to apply a Success Plan template to multiple Success plan types? Or even change the type after added? I am finding it difficult to move things around as an admin and and end-user after something has been created. For Example: I have multiple success plans and one of the templates for success plan type 1, I'd like to also have available for success plan type 2. Is this doable? Or an enhancement request?
I don’t know if there is an idea out here for this already or not, but admins need the ability to deselect dependencies when creating an X-Org 2.0 migration bundle because the scope of the default dependency generator is too broad. As an example, I created two Playbooks associated with a single CTA Type and two Success Plan templates associated with a single Success Plan template. Nothing wild, no custom fields, or anything.The Migration tool identifies 128 dependencies including CTA Types and Success Plan Types that are unrelated to any of these that I am attempting to migrate (including ones that are INACTIVE in my sandbox), in addition to other fields under Company, Call to Action, Task, etc. that did not require/have any changes made to them as part of the generation of these assets. I understand Gainsight is trying to ensure that any dependent assets that may be different/have been adjusted as part of the process are carried over, but this control needs to be given to the admin to determine which dependencies are relevant and which aren’t.For many of us, our Sandboxes are not necessarily 1:1 matches to Production. We often use them as “scratch pads” for testing new features, processes, etc so some of the dependencies the migration tool automatically selects could contain values/components that are not intended for promotion to production.We need more granular control over it. --------Success Plan Template I’m trying to migrate, under the “Extend Product Onboarding” Success Plan type: Migration dependencies include irrelevant SP Types: Including ones that are deactivated:Which it does attempt to insert, since it does not exist in my Production environment: And then attempted updates/insertions to DA Picklists which the logs don’t even define to which picklist they are related to forcing me to try and deduce it but also are either not different between Sandbox and Production and is unclear why they are attempting to update OR are, again, values related to deactivated assets:
Users should be able to synchronize UI settings from Production to Sandbox and vice versa, depending on their workflow.Please provide one or more of the following capabilities :Export/Import of layout and theme settings One-click synchronization between Production and Sandbox (in both directions) Bidirectional migration of appearance-related settings (Production → Sandbox and Sandbox → Production) API support for backing up and restoring these settings
Hi Team, a customer has requested the ability to upload an image in the CTA comments field. They’ve included the attached screenshot illustrating the error message their team receives when attempting to upload the image to the CTA comments.
With the recent automatic email capture feature it appears CSMs can only associate individual emails to Gainsight objects in Timeline, not an entire email thread at once. This enhancement would enable end-users to associate an entire thread to another record (r360, etc) instead of having to handle the association of each email manually.
We would like to have the possibility to edit the meta title separately from the topic title.In the SEO world the lenght of the title is restricted but the heading 1 can be longer, so being able to edit them separately would give us a bit more room in optimizing. @timcavey suggested earlier that editing meta descriptions should be editable → this idea is for the same purpose but we’d also like to be able to edit the title and the heading.
Add the ability to hide/remove a post from the “activity feed”. This would be useful when doing campaigns which require many posts, but where we don’t want each post to crowd out other posts from users.
Our community users would like to receive a notification when a new article is added in a category.
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.