Skip to main content

    Idea Pipeline

    Filter by idea status

    Filter by product area

    6162 Ideas

    katie_b
    katie_bHelper ⭐️

    Remove certain navigation from Admin hierarchyNew Idea

    With some of our 2026 key initiatives, we have a need to enable field level permissions in Gainsight. As we've been testing field level permissions in our sandbox, we've identified a big issue with this feature. Mainly, the fact that it means only those with superadmin level of access will be able to see any navigation that lives within the 'admin' navigation in Gainsight. For the most part, this is fine, however we do have 2 main use cases that apply to non-admin users who use very key areas of the administration navigation but we absolutely do not want to start handing out superadmin capabilities.Use Case 1:Our comms team and primary Journey Orchestrator admins will no longer be able to see Email Validator once we enable field level permissions. This seems like a very logical item that just needs to be moved under Digital Journey instead of Admin.Use Case 2:Last year we created a Reports & Dashboard Admin role in order to enable some of our analytics savvy managers and ICs to build their own reports and dashboards for special projects or use cases only relevant to small teams. This has allowed our admin team to focus on the larger/cross functional builds. While it appears that reports and dashboard build lives in the Insights section of the navigation, we found they also need Admin>Analytics>Report Builder and Admin>Analytics>Dashboard Builder in order to access these tools.This is a bigger concern for us as we want to be able to take advantage of our stakeholders self serving when they can. Our ask is for the product to move 100% of the insights navigation out from Admin...or somehow allow us to give just those admin capabilities needed and not full superadmin access.

    nuts
    nutsHelper ⭐️⭐️

    JOのプログラムにおいて、フローの途中に分岐を可能とする機能が欲しいNew Idea

    JOのプログラムにおいて、フローの途中で分岐を作れるような機能が欲しいです例えば以下のようなユースケースに対応するためですターゲティング顧客に対して1通目のフォローメールを送信 メール未開封の顧客に対して以下のようなアプローチを作る アダプションステージの顧客は、架電CTAを発行 オンボーディングステージの顧客は、7日後に再メールを送信 JOプログラム終了例えばカンパニーなどのオブジェクトからステージフラグを見て分岐させる、ということをすることでより効果的な顧客アクションを実行していけると思っています  In Journey Orchestrator (JO) programs, I’d like a capability to create conditional branches mid-flow.Why this is needed (example use case) Send the first follow-up email to the targeted customers. For customers who did not open the email, create different follow-up approaches depending on their stage: 2-1. Customers in the Adoption stage: trigger a call CTA (e.g., create a task / CTA for outreach). 2-2. Customers in the Onboarding stage: send a second email 7 days later. End the JO program. Expected branching criteriaFor example, the branch could be determined by checking a stage flag on the Company object (or another object) and splitting the flow based on that value.BenefitBeing able to branch within a JO program would enable us to execute more effective, context-aware actions for customers, instead of running separate programs or relying on workarounds.

    Yasas_AK
    Yasas_AKHelper ⭐️

    How to get Customer (user) Search Keywords or Searches that resulted in ZERO Knowledge Base Articles (knowledge content)Parked

    Hi we are really interested to get Customer (based on user type) or User Search Keywords or Searches and count of searches that resulted in ZERO Knowledge Base Articles (hits) or any type of similar knowledge content matching for keywords used by user.We basically need to know what users are looking for (searches) in our Community as of knowledge which we haven’t included in our site so they get 0 hits or results. By identifying that we could improve and create the relevant knowledge which most users look for (that doesn’t exist already).I have already tried GOOGLE ANALYTICS and it is not helpful to identify by user groups and what we exactly need to get based on configurations we have already done in our Community. Also using 2 platforms and 2 databases (GA export and Insided csv export) and combining them together is also not straightforward and practical. So what we need is Insided csv export to include a criteria that provides us with search results (including keywords and number of times and user group) that resulted with zero hits (if possible further division into conversation/question/article - content type missing). This is kind of getting queries that results in 0 results to see what type of Knowledge content is required and what is missing and what audience seek. This is heavily useful feature for organizations to check their KCS and KBA strategies.Really appreciate your implementations with this and hoping to see this functionality via InSided :)