Skip to main content

    Idea Pipeline

    Filter by idea status

    Filter by product area

    6164 Ideas

    lpiconeHelper ⭐️⭐️

    Gainsight PX - Feedback Form or Forward Survey responesNew Idea

    If the following is correct, and the feedback form does not contain all of the user, account and global context values - they should be available to be added by developers.  We would like to use GainsightPX to create a support ticket while the users are in product.We have added very valuable information to gainsight that is not accessible by this simple form. Has anyone come up with another solution / option which I have not found yet? It seems as if our two options are:create, use the feedback form with the restrictive data available - and I do not see the globalContext data in the view - is this a mistake? Type of issue: Support Description: xxx User email:  User id:  Account:  Account id:  create, reuse a survey → which we cannot auto-forward to support (webhooks don’t seem to be an option yet either) Last associated Account id Account Name Type Identify Id Last Seen Date Sign-Up Date Roles Email Unsubscribed Localization Language Active Product Launch Type Accessed Via Integration Is Throttled API Product Environment Global Context accessedViaIntegration Global Context activeProduct Global Context apiProduct Global Context assignmentId Global Context assignmentName Global Context classId Global Context classTitle Global Context consumerFamily Global Context id Global Context isThrottled Global Context localizationLanguage Global Context ltiLaunchUrl Global Context ltiVersion Global Context role Global Context tii_app_key Global Context tii_launch_url Account Account ID Account Name Account Last Seen Date Account Create Date Account Parent Group Id Account Parent Group Name Account Grade Book Admin Enabled Account Discussion Boards Admin Enabled Account Paper Deletion Requests Admin Enabled Account AIW Indicator Admin Enabled Account Online Grading Admin Enabled Account SWS Instructor May OptIn Account License Name Account Similarity Report Admin Enabled Account Translated Matching Admin Enabled Account SWS Account May OptIn Account Anonymous Marking Admin Enabled Account Peer Mark Admin Enabled Account Grammar Check Admin Enabled Account Account Language  

    bradley
    bradleyExpert ⭐️

    Horizon Rules and IDsNew Idea

    I mentioned this in a comment in a separate post a few months ago, but thought it worth calling out again here. In Bionic Rules, you can filter on specific IDs throughout a rule, including in Case statements like the below:(The redacted parts are SFDCIDs) In Horizon Rules, that is no longer possible as any ID field just becomes a lookup. It looks like this:Note that not only is it a lookup, but if you want to add another field or see your full result you’d need to scroll over, but I digress> The issue with the lookup, is if you need to key in a specific ID. In my case, I need to intercept data from an SFDC account and change the SFDC AccountID before my actions. Now, I need to use the contains operator (haven’t tested if that works) or filter for one of the many possible account options (there are duplicates, hence the issue) and test until I’m confident I’ve got the right one selected. I’m guessing that this behavior isn’t going to fundamentally change, but my ask here is can we find some ways to make the functionality more similar? We’re likely not the only ones using these filters in rules or expecting Horizon Rules to be at least as capable as Bionic Rules. Some ideas that would help (if not outright having the same functionality):Allow an ID to at least be input into the search to retrieve the named record As part of the search result, display the ID so you know it’s the one you want In areas like this where there is a lack of functional parity between the two options, have it well documented. Not just the exciting “new workflow” and “Snowflake as a Data Source” headliners, but actual “Here’s how you used to do X in Bionic Rules, here’s the workaround in Horizon Rules”.Thanks!