It would be great to include PDFs as content in the In App Hub. We have many job aids and other content we would like to surface to customers via the In App Hub but each one has to be rewritten as HTML. There is currently no good way to convert a PDF to HTML that retains styling and marketing guidelines consistently. Instead, each document must be rebuilt from scratch as HTML with CSS.
There is a very useful checkbox “Show data from all children” on all reports in C360, that are added to a “Report” type C360 page. It allows to see data accumulative with all child accounts, which in our business is often a must.However, the very same report added to the Summary page will not have this option.Summary page is uniquely useful in its features, so we (as many others) have it as the first page of any customer’s C360 view. However the lack of this checkbox in any reports massively limits this tabs usefulness and clarity.Please add this option for all reports in Summary page as well, for both consistency and improved usefulness, so that users wouldn’t need to navigate away and search for the same report in other C360 tabs. Images for reference:
It would be very beneficial for Spaces invite templates to be universally created to promote consistency and branding across all users.
As an admin, I would like to have a widget/section where I can post news/updates/product releases/etc to all customer spaces.
Hi team,It would be great if CXMs could update their Spaces intro text in bulk. We’re looking to embed an intro video personalized for each CXM, but currently, it seems this has to be done manually for every account. Since some CXMs manage 50+ accounts, this becomes quite a heavy manual lift just to make a small change on the Spaces page.Adding the video really helps create a personal touch, but the current manual process makes it difficult to scale.Additionally, it would be fantastic if the intro text supported tokenization—similar to what’s available in the Rules Engine or CTA comments (e.g., @company name or @CSM name).Are these enhancements planned for an upcoming release?Thanks a million,Alan
History tracking data is important for trend analysis/ forecasting. But, there could be some objects where we are required to maintain just the snapshot data. For example in standard objects like Company/ User or any custom objects – In Company, when did the CSM change or what was the previous ARR? As of today, we do not have the luxury of keeping historic changes in Gainsight but with the help of rules/ objects we can still accomplish this. For demonstration – I’ve created the object ‘Kite Info’, which is loaded around 7am daily. Schema as follows, {*Kite Id(String); Kite Name(String); Kite Date (Date); Kite Value (Number); Kite Location (String) } *Kite Id is the identifier field. I’ve created a backup object that has only those fields which require history tracking(along with the Identifier) – ‘Kite Info Bkp’. This object is loaded 10am daily. But, for the first time – data from ‘Kite Info’ is loaded once ‘Kite Info Bkp’ is created. {*Kite Id(String); Kite Date (Date) ; Kite Value (Number); Kite Location (String) } *Kite Name is consistent hence not required for tracking. Rule Name -> ‘Load Kite Info Backup’, scheduled to run at 10am Load all the values from ‘Kite Info’ to ‘Kite Info Bkp’ with Upsert operation and Identifier ‘Kite Id’ History Tracking object – ‘Kite Info History’ Column Name DataType Kite Id String Kite Date New Date Kite Date Old Date Kite Value New Number Kite Value Old Number Kite Location New String Kite Location Old String Kite Date Changed Boolean Kite Value Changed Boolean Kite Location Changed Boolean Changed Date Date History Tracking Rule Setup, Rule Name à ‘Kite History Tracking’ ; Scheduled to run at 9am daily. “Timing of this rule is of highest importance – this should be scheduled to run after the source ‘Kite Info’ is reloaded but before the backup object ‘Kite Info Backup’ is refreshed. In the Merge task, I’m doing inner join on Kite Id. Fields in the Transformation task ‘Change Capture’ are as follows, Those with prefix ‘new’ are from ‘Kite Info’ Those with prefix ‘old’ are from ‘Kite Info Bkp’ Field List – Kite Id, Kite Date Old, Kite Date New, Kite Date Changed and similarly for Kite Value and Kite Location Case statement, When ‘Kite Value New’ not equals ‘Kite Value Old’ then ‘Kite Value Changed’ is True Similarly for Kite Date and Kite Location. I’m introducing another case field as, When ‘Kite Value New’ not equals ‘Kite Value Old’ (OR) ‘Kite Date New’ not equals ‘Kite Date Old’ (OR) ‘Kite Location New’ not equals ‘Kite Location Old’ Then ‘Changes Made’ is True Only if the above value true, a record will be considered for inserting into History tracking object. Loading into History Tracking object is of INSERT type action, as we have to capture all the changes being done.
We have a lot of Dropdown lists being populated by Rules and data from an integrated system. We would like the ability to allow the Rules to create new Dropdown List values rather than fail if one is not mapped. Example: Countries & StatesOur Country & State lists includes characters that aren’t allowed in Gainsight, including apostrophes. We constantly sell to new Countries and States. This means we need to add dropdown values almost daily. We have never been able to find a full list we can upload through excel. Somehow, values are always missing. We would like the ability to let the Rule create the new Dropdown List values for us as they appear.
We love the existing functionality that allows timeline activities from child accounts to roll up into the parent account's timeline — this has been a great step toward giving our teams a complete picture of account health across hierarchies. We'd love to see this same rollup behavior extended to the AI Cheat Sheet.The ask: When viewing a parent account, the AI Cheat Sheet should synthesize and surface highlights from all child accounts within the hierarchy, not just the parent account itself.Why this matters: For teams managing complex, multi-subsidiary accounts, this would:Reduce context-switching — ICs and Leaders get a full account narrative from a single view Improve executive briefings — quickly understand health and activity across an entire account family without manual aggregation Support proactive risk identification — spot trends across child accounts before they escalateToday, our team is manually piecing together insights across child accounts before every customer meeting. A rolled-up AI Cheat Sheet would make the feature significantly more actionable for enterprise CSM teams.
We use moderation tags to identify topics for various feedback loops. The tags are added to topics by our moderation team as they handle the topics. However, due to the lack of auto-complete (and zero traction for the idea for that), we have numerous misspelled versions of each tag. There is no way for us to do a clean-up of these misspelled versions and remove them. Even after changing the misspelled tag to the correct one, the misspelled version remains present in the filter list. And as such I keep having to check if it has been actually been given to a topic or is still just an empty remnant. You can have customer service clean out the unused tags, but it would be much easier if we can eitherclean-up tags ourselves make it so that unused tags get autodeleted
Description:When a CSM manually overrides a score through the CSM Assessment in Scorecards, the override itself functions correctly and updates the score as expected. However, the percentage displayed in the scorecard is inaccurate.In scenarios where a score is overridden, the UI shows 0% instead of 100%, even though the override is successfully applied. This creates confusion for users because the percentage value does not reflect the actual override action.Current Behavior:The override works correctly and updates the score. The percentage displayed is incorrect (0% instead of 100%) when an override is applied. This occurs across multiple CSM override scenarios.Expected Behavior:When a CSM overrides a score using the CSM Assessment, the percentage displayed should correctly reflect the override (e.g., 100%) rather than showing 0%.Impact:The display is not intuitive for users. It can create confusion during scorecard reviews and reporting. Users may assume the override did not apply correctly because the percentage appears incorrect.Suggested Improvement:Update the Scorecard logic so that when a CSM override is applied, the percentage displayed reflects the override appropriately (e.g., 100%), ensuring the UI aligns with the actual scoring behavior.
While I know that Admins can mass edit CTAs in the Cockpit, it would be helpful if the users have the option to edit/delete recurring CTAs in a mass edit, rather than edit it one at a time and/or request this to be done/completed by the admin.
Right now, it is possible to define visibility by segment on top items in the mega menu. I’d like to have this option also available for subitems in the (recently released) dropdown items. This will make it possible to keep our menu structure clean, but reserve certain pages for customers, for example.
Our community users are asking for the option to sort the replies in Product Updates, specifically to newest first. Default is oldest first and the option to sort the replies isn't there at all right now. Though, in regular topics the option to sort the replies ís there. Can this be added (or created) for the Product Updates as well?
We are a global team and love Cheat Sheet, but would appreciate the ability to view the outputs in multiple languages for our team.
Now that we are on NXT, we are fully shifting our view in Gainsight to the Person/Company Person construct in place of SFDC Contacts.Previously though we had a Related List section on C360 that displayed the list of SFDC Contacts. Our end users would frequently use the Export function on that section:There does not appear to be an export option in the Company Person view:The only workaround I can see would be creating a Related List view off the Company Person, but this would not give them the ability to Create new persons and we don’t want two sections.This is a request to enhance this widget to have an export option.
As we look to provide better opportunities for collaboration across our broader Account teams for a given customer (AE, SE, Renewals Rep, CSM), we would greatly appreciate if consideration was taken to develop the ability to automatically push Gainsight AI-generated Account summaries into Salesforce-linked Slack account channels.
I saw a few other Ideas about an AMA function for Staircase AI, but it would also be nice to have this in CC. The ability to start an AMA where community users can ask whatever they want. Is this something that can be possible for CC?
I’ve found a use case to need to include the Month name as a token. It would be great if we could have a “Month Name” as a date formula to derive the name of the month from a date. I tried doing a case expression, but since it doesn’t give a “Starts With” option, I am not able to derive the month from a date and convert it to text.
In a similar vein to how the C360 used to show True/False and now shows a checkbox for Boolean fields I would love the option to do this in reports. I say option as sometimes True/False/Null may be preferred and sometimes just a Checkbox would be better. This is especially true for when we have end-user facing reports, and those with in-line editing. It is much cleaner to just see a checkbox than a load of text that initially is hard to quickly see who has what set. It also lets us control the options that can be set to just True/False and reserve Null for us admins/back-end updates if required.
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.